While, in human history we have been with privilege, the question why we
accepted in on daily lives. Not to say, we have rebel through time and they are
many examples consider: the Hebrews rebels against the joke of Pharaoh, to peasant
rebellion and slaves rebellions through time. Why after the rebellion past,
Luther rebel against Rome, but when a more radical rebellion took place with
the peasant rebellion, Luther in the name of the order and Luther hated the
same power control Rome impose Rome, but
in his hands he impose the same yoke, but taken sides with Nobility.
Antisemitism has been a product, since the Hebrews believe being select
by a God, and the other, specially the other major monotheistic religions
Christianity and Islam fight for the same privilege could not accepted
Hebrews described the right. Here is the
paradox both religions have the privilege impose an permanent historical
alienation, by imposing color and exclusion from the society. We need to
recognize the original restrictions were created in Caliph of Baghdad in eight
Century restricting Christians, for example introduction of blue color to
identify the Christians, eventually yellow to the Jews, restricting professions,
for the Christian work not suitable to Islam graveyard yard work (i.e. working with the death is not pure), in the same
token in Feudal Europe from the Roman tradition land was the base of the
economy. Constantine restrict the Jews to won land, the only jobs where wine
making who was not consider land ownership and vineyards small to be treat, gardens
products like onions, money leading, since Jews religion emphasis some basic
education, more over education was restrict by the Church control, Jews had
education in reading and writing and the University was run is Guilds to
created exclusion, but certain profession were base on license by the state
Medicine and Advocates. Through this alienation this two religions make sure
dehumanize and to increase the status for the idea of chosen, while the
alienation towards the Jews was ideological, but not unique. The Samaria have
been 700 A.D inhabitant in Samaria, but through different Islam regime, Nablus
Mt Gerezin were deny the right of the Pascal sacrificed and during Ottomans by
restrictions and persecution where reduce to 15,000.
We can recognize in human history the innovation of the force and
created the power of privilege, in US, the innovation of slave was base on Color, and the Roman Catholic Antisemitism was base on ideology that has the authority
in name of a God.
Socrates in the Republic set the rationalization through the fantasy of
the Philosophy king will be benign and wise. In the renaissance, Machiavelli
saw the de Medici, an industry in Political Philosophy to rationalize despotic
nobility, feudal rationalization took a major drive in enlightenment, and many
rulers like Frederick of Great in Prussia, Katharina of Great, in the America
revolution am inherent contradiction devolution of power, but an elite
controlling the power itself.
But not just political power, the innovation of US, slave trade was base
on race, and idea of an individual or group, in many ways the measure conflict
of 20 century who was best power holder, need to said German Nationalism was in
superiority of race given the right of rule and to submitted to Authority,
manifested in Fascism and Dictator like Franco supported by the Rona Catholic
Church (i.e. the introduction of Industrial Genocide, was not Germany or the
Mass Killing by Staling the Honor goes to the Ottoman Empire, and today Turkey
is till deny the mass killing of 1.5
Million Armenians). Nazi Germany, haven delusion, envy and desire of
British imperialism, not different of Japan imperialism having the same
desire. Or Marx with his fantasy a working class because having a yoke of
oppression, can become ethical and benign, in the 1990 the run out steam.
The fallacy of Fukyama, Andrew Carnegie in Gospel Money using protestant
ideology, to rationalize the right robber barons to be the Philosopher King,
Capitalism will be justice and ethical, in the economy meltdown of 2008, due
for 40 years (since Nixon and accelerated by Regan in the 1980s) base on
economy of credit card, where the credit was given according to race, religion
or ethnic group.
Society or individual does not have capacity ourselves to be the
righteous individual who become the philosopher king, since fundamental fallacy
is how well intent, disconnect with time where in the end king does not have
clothing.
The alternative is how community and individual find a middle ground,
where justice is possible, from the economy point of view cooperatives run by
individual or groups. The political frame should be direct democracy and
consensus in a frame of general assemblies. Advocacy should be a commonwealth
of cooperatives and collectives. An irony the computers were design to give a
respond from a nuclear attack by having a decentralize network, the same
network can be use to manage such commonwealth or federation.
No comments:
Post a Comment