Hannover Holocaust Memorial

Hannah Arendt

White Man last stand, Racism and Antisemitism

Friedrich Gustav Emil Martin Niemöller (1892–1984):

First they came for the Socialists, and I did not speak out—

Because I was not a Socialist.

Then they came for the Trade Unionists, and I did not speak out—

Because I was not a Trade Unionist.

Then they came for the Jews, and I did not speak out—

Because I was not a Jew.

Then they came for me—and there was no one left to speak for me

Hannah Arendt in “The Of Origin Totalitarians,” where she analyze two situations intertwined, one Antisemitism and secondly Imperialism, while Arendt does not accept the Antisemitism of 19^th Century is a continuation of Medieval a competition and demonize for ownership of God (Origin of Antisemitism, Israelowitz 2016). Arendt perspective in context the Jews because were consider outside, to maintain control, give a status base on some rights, when this was given in western Europe, many Jews from the West have issue when was extended to the Jews from the East.

The Liberal of the 19^th century saw with envious and disgusted, this was not extended; the question was not privilege but equality, when Napoleon invented the Secular nation, extended civil rights to the most outsiders the Jews. Napoleon lost, Czar and the other Monarchies (Franz Austria and Prussia) take upon a project of restoration—meaning restore absolutism, Autocratic monarchies.

Because the Jews had been outsiders, cannot understand the machination, miss reading, Arendt analyzed when the Jews lost their economic value from money lenders to Bankers (according to Her view; the Jews economic status was based on inter—nations, and now the economic Model was Bankers as Imperial, the differences just not only Networks, but networks based on race superiority, which Jews were consider less than Christian which surrounded).

The imperialism created a sense above the nation, where in Germans speaking found common ground through the culture and language given them a community without national borders, racism become, truly an international movement.

Arendt exemplified this dichotomy D´isreali, while he had no knowledge or understanding of his own Jewish identity in other hand Dreyfus epitomize the last hurried of Antisemitism in the national level and next stage through National Socialism and Fascism, become internationalize hate.  

From the loss of WWII, racism take hold in white identity, in part the failure of centralize socialism in east Europe and Russia, the idea of supplied liberal economy, leaving behind the majority whites, because historically the working class in Europe and some ways in US come from the Serfs, while minorities were left out from the blue collar Jobs—but the dynamics due to international economy, where social outsider is norm leaving the serf out.

Brexit and 2016 elections in US based on despair of the whites being delegated, the last stand, in some ways the changes as the Industrial revolution in 19^th century created inequality and Artesian economy displace by industrialization and mass production, the Artesian could not compete. The rise of National Socialism in Germany in 1930´s was due support of the low middle class and Artesian.

The economic liberalization, first the old privilege network had become irrelevant just fact of population which 2/3 humanity are China and India. Islam itself is 1.2 Billion of followers, the national networks and the decline of the white population, the internet revolution by pass old networks.

The promised the Industry will become again, is not possible due automatization, and networks are run for the minority-majority. While Putin Russia will like 19^th century sphere of influence and russification, and white society in US irrelevant—if US begin a trade war with a nation of 1.3 Billion who for the last decade have created a network independent US. For Europe the aggression of Russia is not just the annexation of the Crimea or the aggression against Ukraine. EU exist because the ethnic and national conflicts of the last 2000 Years had many times left Europe on brick, the conflict of WWI and WWII come to painful conclusion, when the round the Jews and Holocaust happen Europe was guilty for the 2000 of Anti-Semitism, and silence were not least guilty. If US begin data bases for Muslim or mass deportations or using water torture in WWII many Japanese were hang for crimes against Humanity by using such method, we stand silence we are like perpetrators.

What to do the answer is in the White Rose (1944)—boycott any company who participate and kept taps of crimes against humanity, rebel and question, do not accept, justice will happen not the ways will predict.

Fountain

Night Lights

Winds

Up and down

Consensus and Direct Democracy

The concept of consensus was introduced in the ideal of solidarity, not to competition, while they are many types of consensus, from agreement, collaboration, cooperative meaning find the best solution, egalitarian,   inclusive, participatory, and science a consensus is to obtain an epistemology or body of knowledge.

Perhaps the oldest example of consensus decision-making is the Iroquois Confederacy Grand Council, or Haudenosaunee, which has used consensus in decision-making using a 75% super majority to finalize decisions, potentially as early as 1142. Although the modern popularity of consensus decision-making in Western society dates from the women's liberation movement of the 1970s, and anti-nuclear movement the origins of formal consensus can be traced significantly further back.

Historically the Quakers introduced consensus is a form to practice their belief in Christianity, in the 17^th century (Quakers demanded the church to be an entirely voluntary, non-coercive community able to evangelize in a pluralistic society governed by a purely civil state. Such a demand was in sharp contrast to the ambitions of magisterial Protestantism held by the Calvinist majority. Quakers believed that the Roman Church corrupted itself and, through its common heritage, the Church of England as well.), from the Legatine-Arians, who in the 16^th Century were influenced by Walter, Thomas, and Bartholomew Legate (1575 – 18 March 1612, was anti-Trinitarian martyr--lower-class heretical culture in England with the cornerstones of this culture were anti-clericalism and a strong emphasis on Biblical study, but specific doctrines that had rejection of Predestination, Millenarianism, mortalism, anti-Trinitarianism and Hermeticism ).

George Fox (July 1624 – January 1691) was a founder of the Religious Society of Friends, commonly known as the Quakers or Friends, born in the strongly Puritan village of Drayton-in-the-Clay, Leicestershire, England (Fenny Drayton),  24 km west-south-west of Leicester. Imprisoned for blasphemy; a judge mocked Fox's exhortation to tremble at the word of the Lord, calling him and his followers Quakers. Following his refusal to fight against the return of the monarchy (or to take up arms for any reason), his sentence was doubled. The refusal to swear oaths or take up arms came to be a much more important part of his public statements. Refusal to take oaths meant that Quakers could be prosecuted under laws compelling subjects to pledge allegiance, as well as making testifying in court problematic.

The level of agreement necessary to finalize a decision is known as a decision rule: can account, unanimous agreement, unanimous consent, unanimous agreement minus one vote or two votes, unanimous consent minus one vote or two votes, super majority thresholds (90%, 80%, 75%, two-thirds, and 60% are common), simple majority, executive committee decides, person-in-charge decides.

In groups that require unanimous agreement or consent (unanimity) to approve group decisions, if any participant objects, they can block consensus. These groups use the term consensus to denote both the discussion process and the decision rule. Other groups use a consensus process to generate as much agreement as possible, but allow participants to finalize decisions with a decision rule that does not require unanimity.

Consensus is a mechanism has room for dissent: Declare reservations, Stand aside and Object: In groups with a unanimity decision rule, a single block is sufficient to stop a proposal. Other decision rules may require more than one objection for a proposal to be blocked or not pass.

Quaker-based model puts in place a simple, time-tested structure that moves a group towards unity: Multiple concerns and information are shared until the sense of the group is clear, discussion involves active listening and sharing information, norms limit number of times one asks to speak to ensure that each speaker is fully heard, ideas and solutions belong to the group; no names are recorded. The facilitator articulates the sense of the discussion, asks if there are other concerns, and proposes a minute of the decision. The group as a whole is responsible for the decision and the decision belongs to the group The facilitator can discern if one who is not uniting with the decision is acting without concern for the group or in selfish interest. Key components of Quaker-based consensus include a belief in a common humanity and the ability to decide together. The goal is unity, not unanimity.

The consensus-oriented decision-making model: offers a detailed step-wise description of consensus process: Framing the topic, open discussion, identifying underlying concerns, collaborative proposal building, choosing a direction, synthesizing a final proposal and closure.

Critics of consensus, preservation of the status quo, susceptibility to widespread disagreement, stagnation and group dysfunction, susceptibility to splitting and excluding members:  Groupthink. Consensus seeks to improve solidarity in the long run. Accordingly, it should not be confused with unanimity in the immediate situation, which is often a symptom of groupthink.

Direct Democracy used by the Athenians used majority voting processes.  Proponents of consensus decision-making view procedures that use majority rule as undesirable for several reasons. Majority voting is regarded as competitive, rather than cooperative, framing decision-making in a win/lose dichotomy that ignores the possibility of compromise or other mutually beneficial solutions. Additionally, opponents of majority rule claim that it can lead to a tyranny of the majority, a scenario in which a majority places its interests so far above those of an individual or minority group as to constitute active oppression. Advocates of consensus would assert that a majority decision reduces the commitment of each individual decision-maker to the decision. Members of a minority position may feel less commitment to a majority decision, and even majority voters who may have taken their positions along party or bloc lines may have a sense of reduced responsibility for the ultimate decision. The result of this reduced commitment, according to many consensus proponents, is potentially less willingness to defend or act upon the decision.

Opportunit

Possibility

Dreams

Imagination

Nationalism, Ethnicity, Identity and Anarchism

The understanding of Nationalism in today terms, we need to consider 19^th century, where despotic Monarchy based on a divine right, up to the 1700 Europe was par with the Ottoman Empire and China. In the case of the Ottoman the second siege of Vienna in 1683 taken a tool, brought down the Empire a characteristic not unique, but especially found in the Islamic Empire is the absorption of the culture and wealth, and dependents of conquest commodity materials, hinder progress, Organic Chemistry is good example original, Michel Eugène Chevreul (1786-1889) a French study fatty and Alkalis for the developed of soup. Later on in 1828 Friedrich Wöhler produced the organic chemical urea (carbamide), from the inorganic ammonium cyanate NH₄CNO, but in 1856 William Henry Perkin, while trying to manufacture quinine, accidentally manufactured the organic dye, this created an industry, but the crucial breakthrough for organic chemistry was the concept of chemical structure, developed independently and simultaneously by Friedrich August Kekulé and Archibald Scott Couper in 1858. The pharmaceutical industry began in the last decade of the 19th century when the manufacturing of acetylsalicylic acid—more commonly referred to as aspirin—in Germany was started by Bayer. The cheap access to British industry of commodity (India), stop any economic development of their industry.

The idea of nationality according to Napoleon freedom could only be achieved by nationalism, up to the all the conflict in Europe in the secular sense was conflicts of succession, where any treat from the previous monarchy was not respect by the successor, and after Napoleon try to create a liberal, based on citizenship of Nationality included equal right to different Religious, this impact the Jews up to them since 412 the Theodosius Code, where consider not just outsider but equivalent to an adulterer women (the reason Christians forced the Jews to have yellow as identification, because Yellow was color for prostitutes and adultery women, Israelowitz 2016, Historical Origin of Antisemitism). The lost Napoleon, the Reactionary Czar Alexander I, with Austrian and Prussia created “Holy Alliance” based on the Christian Gospel, while the British was the fourth Force and the Foreign Ministry Lord Castlereagh a reactionary Aristocrat, but he consider the Alliance a Mythical nonsense, because for the British the Liberation of the Economy and International Mercantilism was the Empire.

The failure of Napoleon and the Creation of the “Holy Alliance” (Russia, Habbsburg Empire, and Prussia) become an ideal of a restoration to Autocratic, divine right Monarchies. Napoleon Project of secular and based on Citizenship had an effect in Europe, where the restoration was not possible across, since the Holy German Empire collapse in the 1700 reduce the German in small nations, Napoleon created the citizenship and one German Nation. German Identity added the Languages as part of the identity, while Austria spoke for all the German. The German fathers of Nationalism saw the entire Germans rule from Berlin, because Vienna, the Austria Empire was multi-ethnic, multi-culture (the same reaction Hitler felt about Vienna, The Occults Roots  of Nazism, Gooddrick-Clark, 2012)—the roots of Xenophobic Germany was taken place. The eventuality the Liberal Europe lost, but the ideals of strong man ruler in Bolivar (himself travel to see Napoleon Coronation), while the Spanish Monarchy Fernando VII, restore the absolutism, and the more liberal officers plot (the idea of the use of the military as instrument to achieved a political objective, but most of the cases fail, because support especially the peasants—Marx disdain for the peasants was in did, ignorance—Marx assume the peasants were monarchist, deeply conservative, Anti-Liberal, pro-religion (In the Communist Manifest explicit call the "Idiocy of the Rural life"), but, in Spain the liberal officers and elite-- promise land reform, so they had support and hold a fight like in Cadiz in 1820, in the case of Spain with a Generation the Spanish Revolution support come from small towns, villages, peasants). The result when Spain try to impose over the colonies had not personal, not qualify personal and without resources, the reactionary monarchy lost the colonies. In the case of Portugal the royal Family flee to Brazil where they had a constitutional Monarchy, the cousin of the King made claim with British support obtain the Monarchy and force a restoration, with liberal Military after some doing was end to exile.

Where the Holy Alliance introduce the reactionary Louis XVIII the brother of Louis XVI, did not stop many times to overthought Louis reintroduce not just the absolute monarchy, but restore the Catholic Church land privilege, and the absolute to the Aristocrats, eventually his death because his obesity, while Charles X he was more reactionary, taken side with more reactionary class, which wanted back to Feudal times.

But for the rest of Europe in case of Belgium where rebellious gains the Dutch Monarchy, and the rebels had support from the British, since the British had Constitutional Monarchy, sympathize, where the same Italian Revolts Leon XII introduced the law not Jews in the reestablished Papal estates could not hold property.

In proper Russia, an elite officer and many Aristocrats plot against the Czar for a liberal Russia, Decembrist, about 6000, many send to exile in Siberia, some long term Jail, and 5 send to the death. The consequences the reactionary Monarchy had created sphere influence, when the Poles Diet had Autonomy under the threat of Vienna, they revolt against the Czar, applied an early policy used in the Caucasus against Islam, Russification, they deny the identity of them forcing all in Russian, with Russian Education under the Russian Orthodox Church.

Because the repression of the by the “Holy Alliance”, many when underground creating secret societies like the Carbonri, which British encourage in Italy against Napoleon, since now the Napoleon brought the concept of Nation, Europe had not interest to belong to an Empire, how Liberal or secular, but the Nationalism saw themselves, only through secular and liberal societies because Roman Catholic church was power yield by an individual the pope.

One event, which change and inspire the Liberals was Greek independence from the ottomans, while British worry, because will open influence of Russia, to extend the policy of Sphere of influence, and the long run they need to worry, but Russia defect with internal repression, inequality and dependence on commodity. Still the Massacre by Ottomans Chios the killing of women and Children, created support accord the spectrum, many liberal secrets societies  participated, while the reality in the ground, where the Greeks also committed massacres against the Turks, but the death of Lord Byron for the cause created a rally point for the cause.

Evan´s in his 2016 “The pursuit of Power Europe 1815-1914”, describes the emancipation of the serf was done out fear, the serf will emancipated themselves, and the Aristocrats will lost control, for the Monarchist was a top down and for the landless peasants in case of Poland the Czar give the titles of more than 100 Million parcels of land out fear, a land reform which not applied to Russia proper, when Russia Revolution take place the ambivalence, and the support of the revolution, not just come from the working class of the 19^th century, but from the new middle class, where the liberal found their natural constitutes. A second reason for the emancipation was the fact, because like in case Austria and Prussia, 40% of the income when to taxes to the Empire around 17%, the rest to the Aristocrats holder undermines the development of Agriculture. The landowners found others ways for a compensation their loss, because they control Justice, they had way black mail tenets. Still the integration of the peasant agriculture to development created situation where the peasant only had his labor to sold, reducing into a queasy-serfdom, in Prussia up to the time WWI, and the peasant did not have the right of factory workers and the land gentry can still continue the tradition of corporal punishment. The situation did not mean was passive across Europe peasant revolt took place in Russia 1834-1863 illegal tree cutting  20,000 charges each years, 950 cases of arson 1905-1907. The reaction in Europe was blame to agitators, religious fervor and Jews, but the Czar fear of the peasant in Russia cancel redemption payments and extension of the Peasant Land Bank. The same revolt occurred across Romania, Moldova, which the Army was end to culled down the revolts.

In Spain by 1830, the land owners increase the power by using sharecropping system. In Spain the reintroduction of absolutism of the Monarchy and the agriculture reform was sunder liberal governments, the Carlista revolts was anti-liberal and the hate against peasants. The first Carlista revolt 1832-1839, many of the small landowners and peasant fought Napoleon as Guerrilla warfare under British support had the expertise and succession fight between Fernando VII and his younger brother Carlos began the peasant revolts.  The revolt was the landowners to grant any reform, the conflict continues in 1847 and the third Carlista 1872-1876.

The south of Spain were the liberal administration were not able to introduce Agrarian reform since the Aristocrats with the land owners power stop any reform, the peasant turn to Anarchy in 1848.Revolt in Italy in 1863, which the entire Italian Army was send to stop revolts, the Napoleon reform never introduced. In Europe the lack of the reform took new faces of banditry and discontent.

On the other hand, the working class in 1800´s began, while Artesian (the Guilds were consider Privilege, and reservoir of the land less peasant as the working class in the industrial revolution) was used were being displace, many of the work in the Textile in North France South Belgium, where being treat was harsh and especially the Deutsch owners, many were monarchist, the saw the workers not least humans, with harsh measures like deductive pay from being late, using toileted often, to oil the machines to much including low quality—temperatures in this fabrics in the 30 Celsius (not access to water), with 14 hours days brought strike and open conflict again the owners, most of the textile workers were women and children. The factories were very dangerous placed and affecting health from bronchitis to deafens, the employers blamer the works from their own health, since they consider the place is dangerous place—according to them they work own risk.

The industrial revolution coined by the French economist Jerome-Adolphe Blanqui (1798-1854) mean besides of mass production, was the used of machines for this uniform and mass production and extended to every possible industry (still dangerous with the new machines in some ways increased for need of tempo). While promises never kept by mine operators for such dangerous work, the workers created their system of support, the creation working associations for their own protection.

Nationalism based an idea of Citizenship, and ethnicity base on languages distinct, reinforce by religious believe such was the case in 19^th Century Austria Czech or Finland relationship with Russia manifested in Finish Karvala or Music Sevilus in some places like Germany take darker meaning the introduction of race or in 21 Century British exit of European Unit base on demagogue right tory racist against Eastern Europeans, transforming into identity (in 2008 the race riots in Belfast against Polish was preview), while the resentment manifested against the other, the roots, are Margaret—Neo Liberal economy, which the New Feudal overlords are the wealth and the new peasant the res the 99%.  The air since collapse of the Soviet, centralize state, and with the economic meltdown of 2008 of the Neo-liberal not regulations, where individuals without impunity raided the coffers of the state, leaving the population in poverty, in the 1848 the spirit of revolt against the restoration is the same today where the dogmatic neo-liberalism forcing a few owning the wealth, leaving the rest of population in Dickerson Novel without hope.    

The delusional contradiction of the Marxist like in the revolts 1848, freedom could not be obtain just by guaranty of citizenship, since the fundamental question is who is the citizen and exclusions begin, you cannot obtained freedom by dictatorship of the state (or an elite which is to enforce an homogeneous behavior).

While, the support not only come from reactionary Roman Catholic Church, expressed by British-Scottish Catholics,  Beevor, the Battle For Spain, The Spanish Civil War 1936-1939 (2206), the direct involvement by the Mussolini--Fascist and the German National Socialist. The idea of region exercising power defined the privilege through citizenship or ballot. The underline of Anarchy is the relationship of power and his application, while individual can identify and express, where for Marxist the idea of power of the state many liberation movements like the Italian Unification, Poland as Nation, taken victimization to a level justification of power, of course, injustices exist due to this power relationships, the question become how resolved. The Kurd's, who provide Suleiman, and Prussia King, who for his own purpose use Islam as Political stamen, in 1905 with his visit to his Suleiman grave, to obtain the alliances of the Ottomans, therefore Muslims and the policy of the used of Political Islam continue under National Socialist to the point creation SS units under Mufti of Jerusalem, participated not only in Genocide of Serbian and Jews. But Churchill, after the Ottoman took side with the Prussia Kaiser in WWI conflict, deny any territorial recognition, forcing the Kurd's into new nations created by the British, where 20 Million under the Turks. The conflict of Syria and by then Öcolan in Prison, inspire by Brookchin Libertarian Municipalities, and the Islamic State is conclusion by Republican US administration invasion Iraq, the Islamic State an ideal creation to a Theocratic State—many of their support come from alienation of a youth not able to adapt to secular consume society, they themselves having idealized Islam, where Ottoman come to the doors to Vienna twice, conquest and hold Spain closed 900 years, since 1700´s and especially 19^th century behind of an industrial, scientific and technological revolution. The Öcalan see a Libertarian as Autonomous region inside the state: Rojava, where multi ethnic-equal society builds under Libertarian Municipality ideals.