For the Record

 

According to Masur in “Until Justice will be done”, 2021(W.W. Norton Company), African Americans began with some rights in 1776 and they were strip to 1863. In her book which point out the free state of Ohio, Cincinnati, perhaps being in Southern states,  Kentucky, the laws become restrictive, many of the free states had two laws which maintain the segregation, African Americans could not testify against the white man and not mixing of the race.

But, the most significant fact to discourage was used vagrant laws, but what was in in play, if a white owner consider free his slave, he most to provide a pay to the community and proof they slave will not be burning cost to the community, the consequences was vagrants applied to the white poor, but was target to African Americans, the lazy fare Capitalism born in the fact to deny any community support, since the whites had privilege their material needs and freedoms are not in question.

The Southern Capitalism built a Slave based on color, to maintain a distinction to privilege assure not community support, included the white poor, their believe God provided them, because their privilege, included the tools access to an education, by creating standards how to be in this privilege—from the way to speaking, expectations, behavior, they defined who can be given this privilege.

While the Southern States did not hide this facts, the Northern States by believe in settle way off class defined the brutish southern behavior, when Segregation became the Law and Jim Crow become law in South, in the Northern States was settle, when desegregation was enforce, white in the US fly to the Suburban US, where they can enforced this privilege based, they were confined in private—white privilege become not just an identity, but following their living standard. The New Deal for white in US, only should be applied to them—anyone who was not Anglo-Saxon should not have any rights, the immigrations laws from 1844 against the Chinese was to set president only Anglo-Saxons have the rights—the fight about the Race history in US, was to deny such white privilege, even as un-spoken become the rule, of course the issue, because the lack of social support for healthcare, education or social support, to make sure  non-whites in US do not belong, the reason is to maintain the 200 + years of white privilege.

May 1 2021

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Spring Snow

 

Spring Dreams

 

clair de lune

 

Side and Consequences

 

 

The conservative Spanish, US educated Diplomat, Philosopher George Santayana, in 1905, aphorism: Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it (George Santayana (1905) Reason in Common Sense, p. 284, volume 1 of The Life of Reason). In 2021 the history which produced the Industrial Genocide of WII, the fight for the right of Empires of WWI, and racism and the Antisemitism—the British delusion of Empire through the exit of British from European Union, need some context.

Napoleon desire of a Secular Empire, up to the French Sun king following the tradition which Rome, where Cesar become a God, Feudal Europe and Aristocrat believed absolute—autocratic power, where they have power to decide who have the right in his territory, where the Church given the right as the King represented God in Earth (the Byzantium or the Holy Roman Empire), while French revolution fought the absolutism which Aristocrats could decide the status of any individual. Napoleon cross the line by Given the Jews a civil citizen, by recognized the right, of birth and power of the civil state to granted the citizenship.

This momentous recognition, when Napoleon lost, the Holy Alliances as reactionary forced between Austria, Prussia and Russian Czar the first action was to reestablished power of the Autocracy by defined their powers who become and what right citizen will have—while for the British their pragmatic interest was to maintain their mercantile power, what meant they wanted to have Europe divided or being subjugation of Aristocrats their privilege will be maintain.

In the case of the Russian Czar (Evans R, 2016. The Pursuit of Power Europe 1815-1914, Penguin Random House), he lift subjugation of the peasants, which was the heart of Russia, and he was able to maintain their Royalty during the 1917 revolution, the Bolsheviks used destruction to dislodge peasants loyalty to the Czar, where in Prussia, the conservative  Prime Minister Otto von Bismarck, who 1871 masterminded German unification, his vision saw Germany as industrial Empire, to maintain the Aristocrats and Industrialist, and his fear to Social Democrats (Anti-Socialist law 1878), which persecuted and ban from public and private spheres, his strategy in the 1880´s was to win the workers over for the conservative regime by implementing social benefits. He added accident and old-age insurance as well as a form of socialized medicine (health car and option to insurance). He did not succeed and the support for the Social Democrats increased with each election.

In Austria being Empire of different ethnic groups, the Aristocrats and elite were Germans or Hungarians, in many cases the peasants where the  other ethnic groups, they denied any rights, which open to Sarajevo.

For the British as Hannah Arendt in The Origins of Totalitarianism, Rhodes ideal, Rhodes donation to Oxford was to advance Anglo-Saxon; significance was the British used of race to rationalize the used of Africans, while Spain and Portuguese did not hide, their used was economic—their difference, their mingle, where the British did not,  religion since the reformation loss of power, needed a rationalization, without merit or based creation by his cousin Francis Galton Eugenics to rationalize the exclusion and oppression of others were not Anglo-Saxon (Okrent D, 2019. Bigotry, Eugenics, and the Law that Kept Two Generations of Jews, Italians and other European Immigrants out America, The Guarded Gate, Scribner).

A well know forgery Anti-Semitic book—disseminated by the Czar secret police, source of the material Dialogue aux enfers entre Machiavel et Montesquieu (Dialogue in Hell Between Machiavelli and Montesquieu), an 1864 political satire by Maurice Joly and a chapter from Biarritz, an 1868 novel by the antisemitic German novelist Hermann Goedsche, which had been translated into Russian in 1872.

Elements of the Protocols were plagiarized from Joly's fictional Dialogue in Hell, a thinly veiled attack on the political ambitions of Napoleon III, who, represented by the non-Jewish character Machiavelli, plots to rule the world.

Joly, a republican who later served in the Paris Commune, was sentenced to 15 months as a direct result of his book's publication. Umberto Eco considered that Dialogue in Hell was itself plagiarised in part from a novel by Eugène Sue, Les Mystères du Peuple (1849–56).

Identifiable phrases from Joly constitute 4% of the first half of the first edition, and 12% of the second half; later editions, including most translations, have longer quotes from Joly.

The Protocols 1–19 closely follow the order of Maurice Joly's Dialogues 1–17.

 

 

Dialogue in Hell Between Machiavelli and Montesquieu	The Protocols of the Elders of Zion
How are loans made? By the issue of bonds entailing on the Government the obligation to pay interest proportionate to the capital it has been paid. Thus, if a loan is at 5%, the State, after 20 years, has paid out a sum equal to the borrowed capital. When 40 years have expired it has paid double, after 60 years triple: yet it remains debtor for the entire capital sum.   — Montesquieu, Dialogues, p. 209	A loan is an issue of Government paper which entails an obligation to pay interest amounting to a percentage of the total sum of the borrowed money. If a loan is at 5%, then in 20 years the Government would have unnecessarily paid out a sum equal to that of the loan in order to cover the percentage. In 40 years it will have paid twice; and in 60 thrice that amount, but the loan will still remain as an unpaid debt. — Protocols, p. 77
Like the god Vishnu, my press will have a hundred arms, and these arms will give their hands to all the different shades of opinion throughout the country.   — Machiavelli, Dialogues, p. 141	These newspapers, like the Indian god Vishnu, will be possessed of hundreds of hands, each of which will be feeling the pulse of varying public opinion.   — Protocols, p. 43
Now I understand the figure of the god Vishnu; you have a hundred arms like the Indian idol, and each of your fingers touches a spring.   — Montesquieu, Dialogues, p. 207	Our Government will resemble the Hindu god Vishnu. Each of our hundred hands will hold one spring of the social machinery of State.   — Protocols, p. 65

 

Daniel Keren wrote in his essay Commentary on The Protocols of the Elders of Zion: Goedsche was a postal clerk and a spy for the Prussian Secret Police. He had been forced to leave the postal work due to his part in forging evidence in the prosecution against the Democratic leader Benedict Waldeck in 1849. Following his dismissal, Goedsche began a career as a conservative columnist, and wrote literary fiction under the pen name Sir John Retcliffe.

 His 1868 novel Biarritz contains a chapter called: The Jewish Cemetery in Prague and the Council of Representatives of the Twelve Tribes of Israel. In it, Goedsche (who was unaware that only two of the original twelve Biblical tribes remained) depicts a clandestine nocturnal meeting of members of a mysterious rabbinical cabal that is planning a diabolical Jewish conspiracy. At midnight, the Devil appears to contribute his opinions and insight. The chapter closely resembles a scene in Alexandre Dumas' Giuseppe Balsamo (1848), in which Joseph Balsamo a.k.a. Alessandro Cagliostro and company plot the Affair of the Diamond Necklace.

In 1872 a Russian translation of The Jewish Cemetery in Prague appeared in Saint Petersburg as a separate pamphlet of purported non-fiction. François Bournand, in his Les Juifs et nos Contemporains (1896), reproduced the soliloquy at the end of the chapter, in which the character Levit expresses as factual the wish that Jews be: kings of the world in 100 years —crediting a Chief Rabbi John Readcliff. Perpetuation of the myth of the authenticity of Goedsche's story, in particular the Rabbi's speech, facilitated later accounts of the equally mythical authenticity of the Protocols.

Like the Protocols, many asserted that the fictional rabbi's speech had a ring of authenticity, regardless of its origin: This speech was published in our time, eighteen years ago, read an 1898 report in La Croix: and all the events occurring before our eyes were anticipated in it with truly frightening accuracy.

 

Fictional events in Joly's Dialogue aux enfers entre Machiavel et Montesquieu, which appeared four years before Biarritz, have been the inspiration for Goedsche's fictional midnight meeting, and details of the outcome of the supposed plot. Goedsche's chapter may have been an outright plagiarism of Joly, Dumas père, or both.

Fast forward 2021, the British exit was to destabilized, European Union, while for the British elite saw EU as economic zone, the reason entre for the European Union, after 2000 years continuous wars religious, aristocrats and the industrials wars of WWI, WWII, Europe is peace offer to themselves to the world.

The hate carries by white supremacist in the US and the white rage of Boris Johnson, from the new Russian Czar Putin; they will like to revive a reactionary Alliance of 19^th Century, for the white supremacist in US a revival of the Jim Crow law´s.

 

Winter Tunnel

Repeat

 

In August 8, 1925 the 30000 KKK march in Washington DC, the United rally took place in August 11-12, 2017 in Charlottesville Virginia, in 1925 President at time Calvin Coolidge, at the same time the KKK in 1920´s about 60% of the white population was a member or sympathized with the KKK, in 1925 Stephenson then Head of the Klan kill and rape Madge Oberholtzer, putting an end.

The US had never deal with white supremacy, the reason used of slaves as economics due to the British Monarchy and adapted in his colonies the used of skin color to justified, while the used of the Christian, while Islam used of slave institution applied for pagans. In time, secularization and with efforts of Francis Galton (related to Darwin) and Henry Cabot Lodge (Okrent D, 2019. The Guarded Gate, Scribner), their efforts project the Anglo Saxon Racism (Arendt in Origins of Totalitarianism) to immigration creating in 30 years a quota system, which closed the doors during German Genocide of the Jews in 1940´s.

After Lincoln come to realization the economics of the Southern States (today the spirit and the structure of the Racism still in place in Southern states), where the economic and political power only to applied to white Anglo-Saxon which culminated with the attend and insurrection of January 6, 2021—to reinserted the white Anglo-Saxon privilege of Power—only white Anglo-Saxon in US have the right, not other.

Today, they are trying to reinserted themselves, by suppressing the rights of vote again the African-Americans, Latinos or any one in their view is not white enough, this the situation of having a fourth years of white supremacist administration.